Here is the list of eligible candidates for the interview.
If you have any objection, please contact us before 13th November at vihanapp@gmail.com

Sr No. Candidate NameEligibility Reason  
1Riddhima DwivediYesThe candidate demonstrates strong technical expertise and problem-solving skills suited for the role.  
2Shaiyma ParveenYesThe candidate shows excellent communication and teamwork abilities that align with company objectives.  
3Dharna SinghYesThe candidate possesses relevant experience and a proven track record of delivering quality work.  
4Nitesh SinghYesThe candidate exhibits adaptability, dedication, and a strong willingness to learn and grow.  
5Sunny KumarYesThe candidate has the right blend of professionalism, creativity, and commitment to company success.  
6Manvendra RaiNoThe candidate does not meet the required experience level for the position.  
7Riya VermaNoThe candidate’s skills did not fully align with the job requirements.  
8Riddhi ChoubeyNoThe candidate lacked sufficient technical knowledge or practical expertise.  
9Shubham AgrwalNoThe candidate did not demonstrate the level of communication or teamwork skills needed.  
10Vanshika Tiwari NoThe candidate’s profile was good, but another applicant was a better fit for the role.  
11Ankit SinghNoThe candidate’s performance during the interview did not meet our expectations.  
12Ankit KumarNoThe candidate did not possess the specific qualifications required for the position.  
13Aman KumarNoThe candidate’s experience was in a different field than what the role demands.  
14Vinayak PrajapatiNoThe candidate was unable to clearly demonstrate problem-solving or critical thinking skills.  
15Rajkumar SalantiNoThe candidate’s availability or work schedule did not match the company’s requirements.  
16Paavas GoyalNoThe candidate’s expected salary exceeded the budget for this role.  
17Samarth GuptaNoThe candidate did not show enough understanding of our company’s values and goals.  
18Ansh GargNoThe candidate lacked leadership or decision-making qualities needed for the position.  
19Krishna GargNoThe candidate’s technical test or assessment results were below the required level.  
20M. Sai GauravNoThe candidate was not selected as other applicants showed stronger overall suitability.  
21PALLAV RAINoThe candidate did not demonstrate adequate initiative or motivation for the role.  
22Raghunandan TomarNoThe candidate’s communication style did not align with our organizational culture.  
23ABHAY PRATAP SINGHNoThe candidate lacked relevant certifications or credentials required for the position.  
24Gautham AshokNoThe candidate did not provide clear or detailed responses to technical questions.  
25Shubham AgarwalNoThe candidate’s attitude and approach were not consistent with our professional standards.  
26Sumant SagarNoThe candidate showed limited understanding of the job responsibilities and expectations.  
27Abhinay S BhadauriaNoThe candidate’s portfolio or previous work did not meet our quality benchmarks.  
28Shristi SinghNoThe candidate’s long-term career goals did not align with the company’s direction.  
29Yuvraj SinghNoThe candidate’s references or background check did not fully support their application.  
30Virat SinghNoThe candidate was unable to effectively demonstrate time management or multitasking skills.  
31Ishan Amrit SrivastavaNoThe candidate does not meet the required experience level for the position.  
32Abhik GoswamiNoThe candidate’s skills did not fully align with the job requirements.  
33Anubhav SinghNoThe candidate lacked sufficient technical knowledge or practical expertise.  
34Ritika BhadaniNoThe candidate did not demonstrate the level of communication or teamwork skills needed.  
35Alok ShukaNoThe candidate’s profile was good, but another applicant was a better fit for the role.  
36Abhianv BehaniyaNoThe candidate was unable to effectively demonstrate time management or multitasking skills.  
37ANKIT MISHRANoThe candidate’s skills did not fully align with the job requirements.  
38VANSHIKA SHARMANoThe candidate lacked sufficient technical knowledge or practical expertise.  
39Sumit tiwariNoThe candidate did not demonstrate the level of communication or teamwork skills needed.  
40Priyanshi MahajanNoThe candidate’s profile was good, but another applicant was a better fit for the role.  
41Chahat DhirNoThe candidate’s performance during the interview did not meet our expectations.  
42Khushi GuptaNoThe candidate did not possess the specific qualifications required for the position.  
43Saurabh ShisodeNoThe candidate’s experience was in a different field than what the role demands.  
44Ashok PandiyaNoThe candidate was unable to clearly demonstrate problem-solving or critical thinking skills.  
45Aarav Sandeep SaklaniNoThe candidate’s expected salary exceeded the budget for this role.  
46Mustaqeem MominNoThe candidate’s technical test or assessment results were below the required level.  
47Vanshika BhojaniNoThe candidate was not selected as other applicants showed stronger overall suitability.  
      

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Request A Call Back

Ever find yourself staring at your computer screen a good consulting slogan to come to mind? Oftentimes.

shape
Your experience on this site will be improved by allowing cookies.